- Written on
- 5 min. reading time
If you look at a mushroom and a human side by side, nothing about their appearance suggests kinship. One moves, one stays rooted. One breathes, one fruits. One thinks, dreams, remembers; the other grows in the half-light of decomposition. Yet beneath these visible differences lies a quieter truth written into the molecules that shape life: humans share more genes with mushrooms than with trees.
The idea sounds like a riddle, or a metaphor disguised as science. But the evidence has accumulated across decades of phylogenetic research. The more geneticists compared the blueprints of life, the more one pattern emerged, animals and fungi belong to the same evolutionary branch, diverging from plants over a billion years ago.
Long before forests existed, long before coral reefs assembled themselves from calcium and sunlight, Earth hosted the early ancestors of animals and fungi, both heterotrophs navigating a world of microbial abundance. These ancient organisms did not photosynthesize; instead, they consumed, absorbed, and inhaled the energy of others. That decision, or perhaps that limitation, bound the two lineages together, shaping a shared evolutionary destiny.
The surprise is not simply that animals and fungi form sister groups, but how consistently genetic data reinforces this relationship. Studies comparing sequences from twenty-five proteins reveal characteristic insertions and deletions that exist only in animals and fungi, never in plants. In proteins such as elongation factor 1-alpha and enolase, these molecular fingerprints act like small signatures left behind by evolution, telling us who our closest relatives are. When analyzed through maximum-parsimony models, the data repeatedly place animals and fungi together, side by side on the tree of life.
Popular science sometimes summarizes this with a simple line: humans share about 50 percent of their DNA with mushrooms. It is a convenient shorthand, though not a precise one. Genetic overlap does not mean that half of our genome “matches” a portobello. Rather, it reflects shared ancestral genes, many of them ancient, fundamental, and universal to the operation of life, genes involved in respiration, cellular communication, protein synthesis.
But despite the imprecision, the underlying truth remains: humans and fungi speak a surprisingly similar molecular language.
The similarities extend beyond genetics. Animals and fungi both store energy as glycogen, while plants store energy as starch. Fungal cell walls contain chitin, the same material that forms insect exoskeletons. Plants, on the other hand, build themselves from cellulose, a very different structural world. Animals breathe in oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide; so do fungi. Plants do the reverse, weaving sunlight into sugar and releasing oxygen as a byproduct.
These distinctions reflect profoundly different evolutionary strategies. Plants chose sunlight. Animals and fungi chose movement, consumption, and biochemical agility. At times, fungi evolved into vast mycelial superstructures, capable of digesting entire ecosystems. At other times, they became partners, decomposers, pathogens, symbionts. Their flexibility mirrors our own evolutionary improvisation, a lineage defined not by uniformity but by adaptation.
There is also the matter of vitamin D. Under ultraviolet light, mushrooms produce vitamin D in a way reminiscent of human skin cells, converting precursors into active nutrient. It is a small example, but one that further erodes the boundary between “us” and “them.” Even certain fungal pathogens exploit vulnerabilities similar to those targeted in human immune systems, hinting at shared susceptibilities shaped by ancient molecular design.
Understanding this kinship requires abandoning the hierarchy we often impose on nature. Trees feel intuitively closer to us because they are large, visible, and familiar. Mushrooms appear temporary, almost decorative, appearing after rain, dissolving back into soil. But evolution is blind to our instincts about similarity. It follows only the logic of divergence. Once animals and fungi split from the plant lineage, their paths stayed intertwined for hundreds of millions of years, accumulating shared traits even as their forms drifted apart.
What fascinates researchers is not simply the closeness of animals and fungi, but what that closeness suggests about the origins of complex life. Before the branches of the tree of life fanned outward, early organisms experimented with ways of surviving a young, unstable planet. Some learned to capture sunlight. Others learned to consume. Fungi and animals evolved as partners in this second strategy, refining enzymes, membranes, and metabolic pathways suited for digestion rather than photosynthesis.
That shared ancestry reverberates through ecosystems today. Fungi cycle nutrients essential for animal life. They form mycorrhizal networks that feed plants, which in turn feed animals. They break down organic matter that would otherwise suffocate forests in their own debris. And in a more intimate sense, fungal biology has helped shape human medicine. Antibiotics, statins, immunosuppressants, many of the molecules that extend human life originate from fungal intelligence honed over eons.
Even viruses move between fungal and animal systems, exploiting similarities in host-cell machinery. This is not cause for alarm but a reminder of our interconnectedness. The biological boundaries between kingdoms are less rigid than the categories we build to describe them.
Still, it is tempting to overstate the similarity. Humans are not “half mushroom” any more than mushrooms are “half human.” What the genetic overlap reveals is shared ancestry, not shared identity. The way evolution preserves useful genes across species is less an expression of kinship and more a testament to life’s efficiency. If a protein works well in one lineage, evolution tends to keep it.
But the comparison is valuable for another reason: it invites humility. We often imagine ourselves as distant from other organisms, separated by intellect, technology, or consciousness. Yet the deeper we look into our biology, the more we are returned to the same truth: life is a continuum, stitched together by inheritance.
The mushroom on a forest floor is not a distant cousin in a metaphorical sense; it is a literal one. And when geneticists place animals and fungi side by side, they are not making a philosophical argument. They are simply following the evidence.
The insight does not diminish human uniqueness, nor does it elevate fungi above their ecological role. What it offers is perspective, a fuller understanding of the forces that shaped us. To know that humans are closer to mushrooms than trees is to recognize that the world is not divided into clean categories but woven from shared beginnings.
In that sense, the mushroom is not simply part of the forest. It is part of our story too.
